physics2u
Depth
Derivation

The Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation

D-137 Home PU-202 Threads matter · waves · energy Depends on de-broglie-relation, planck-einstein-relation
Statement

For a single non-relativistic particle of mass m moving in a real scalar potential V(r,t), the complex wavefunction Ψ(r,t) obeys the linear first-order-in-time equation iℏ ∂tΨ = −(ℏ²/2m)∇²Ψ + VΨ. This is the unique wave equation that (i) is linear in Ψ, (ii) is first order in time, and (iii) forces every free plane wave Ψ ∝ ei(k·r−ωt) to satisfy the non-relativistic dispersion ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m built from the de Broglie relation p = ℏk and the Planck–Einstein relation E = ℏω.

Why it matters

The time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) is the equation of motion of non-relativistic quantum mechanics: given the state now, it fixes the state at every later time. Everything else — stationary states, tunnelling, spectra, scattering, the entire chemistry of atoms and molecules — is a consequence of solving it under boundary conditions.

Crucially the equation is not derived from classical mechanics; it is constructed so that its plane-wave solutions carry exactly the energy and momentum that de Broglie and Planck–Einstein already assigned to a matter wave. Seeing that construction — which choices are forced and which are postulates — is what separates understanding the equation from merely quoting it.

Assumptions
The particle is non-relativistic:we use E = p²/2m for kinetic energy; if dropped, the correct free dispersion is E² = p²c² + m²c⁴ and one is led to the Klein–Gordon or Dirac equations instead. The evolution is linear in Ψ:superpositions of solutions are solutions; if dropped, interference and the whole Hilbert-space structure collapse, and probabilities no longer combine by amplitude. The equation is first order in time:the state at one instant determines all later states, so Ψ(r,t0) alone is a complete initial condition; if dropped (second order in t), one must also specify ∂tΨ and the interpretation of |Ψ|² as a conserved probability density fails. The wavefunction is complex and the operator relation iℏ∂t ↔ E, −iℏ∇ ↔ p holds:a genuinely complex phase e−iEt/ℏ is required for a single travelling wave to have definite E and p; if Ψ were real, no single plane wave could be an eigenstate of both, and probability current would vanish identically. The potential V is real:this makes the Hamiltonian Hermitian and total probability conserved; if V has an imaginary part, norm is not preserved and the model describes absorption or particle loss rather than closed-system dynamics.
Derivation
1
Ψ(r,t) = A ei(k·r − ωt)
Posit the simplest free-particle matter wave: a monochromatic plane wave of wavevector k and angular frequency ω, as demanded by de Broglie. A
2
p = ℏk,    E = ℏω
Import the two prior results: de Broglie relation for momentum and Planck–Einstein relation for energy, so the wave carries definite p and E. A
3
Ψ = A ei(p·r − Et)/ℏ
Substitute the physical variables p, E for the kinematic k, ω; the phase is now written entirely in dynamical quantities. A
4
∂tΨ = −(iE/ℏ)Ψ  ⇒  iℏ ∂tΨ = EΨ
Differentiate once in time and rearrange: acting with iℏ∂t extracts the eigenvalue E. This identifies the operator Ê = iℏ∂t. B
5
−iℏ∇Ψ = pΨ  ⇒  −ℏ²∇²Ψ = p²Ψ
Differentiate in space: −iℏ∇ extracts p, and applying it twice extracts p². This identifies the operator p̂ = −iℏ∇. B
6
E = p²/2m
Impose the non-relativistic free-particle energy–momentum relation. This is the physical input that selects the non-relativistic theory. A
7
EΨ = (p²/2m)Ψ
Multiply the dispersion relation by Ψ so each side can be replaced by its operator action from steps 4–5. A
8
iℏ ∂tΨ = −(ℏ²/2m) ∇²Ψ
Substitute EΨ = iℏ∂tΨ (step 4) and p²Ψ = −ℏ²∇²Ψ (step 5). The free TDSE now holds for a single plane wave. B
9
Ψ = ∫ d³k  Φ(k) ei(k·r − ω(k)t)
Because steps 4, 5 and 8 involve only linear operators, an arbitrary superposition of plane waves also satisfies step 8. Linearity promotes the single-mode result to a general free wavefunction. C
10
E = p²/2m + V(r,t)
Restore interactions via the classical Hamiltonian: total energy is kinetic plus potential. Promoting E → iℏ∂t, p → −iℏ∇, with V acting by multiplication, gives the full equation. C
Result
iℏ ∂Ψ/∂t = −(ℏ²/2m) ∇²Ψ + V(r,t)Ψ = ĤΨ

Reading. The rate of change of the wavefunction’s phase and amplitude (left) is set by the total-energy operator, the Hamiltonian Ĥ = −(ℏ²/2m)∇² + V (right). The factor i makes evolution unitary rather than diffusive: probability is transported and interferes, not smeared away. Given Ψ now, the equation dictates Ψ at every later instant.

Units check. [ℏ∂tΨ] = (J·s)(s−1)[Ψ] = J·[Ψ]. [ℏ²∇²Ψ/m] = (J·s)²(m−2)/kg ·[Ψ] = (kg²m⁴s−2)(m−2)(kg−1)[Ψ] = kg·m²·s−2·[Ψ] = J·[Ψ]. [VΨ] = J·[Ψ]. All three terms carry units of energy × [Ψ], so the equation is dimensionally homogeneous for any units of Ψ.

Limiting cases
  • Free particle (V = 0). Recovers step 8; plane waves obey ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m, i.e. the non-relativistic dispersion the equation was built to reproduce.
  • Time-independent V(r). Separation Ψ = ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏ gives the time-independent Schrödinger equation Ĥψ = Eψ for stationary states.
  • Slowly varying, large action (ℏ → 0). Writing Ψ = eiS/ℏ and keeping leading order yields the classical Hamilton–Jacobi equation ∂tS + (∇S)²/2m + V = 0: the classical limit.
  • Constant V = V0. Only shifts the global phase by e−iV0t/ℏ; no observable is changed, consistent with energy being defined up to a constant.
Breaks when
  • Speeds approach c. The kinetic input E = p²/2m (step 6) is the non-relativistic approximation; at high energy one needs E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, giving the Klein–Gordon/Dirac equations. Spin then also emerges and cannot be added by hand here.
  • Particle number changes. A single fixed-mass wavefunction cannot describe pair creation, decay, or photon emission/absorption; those require quantum field theory, where Ψ is promoted to an operator field.
  • Open or dissipative systems. If the particle exchanges energy incoherently with an environment, unitary evolution fails; one needs a density-matrix master (Lindblad) equation rather than the TDSE for a pure state.
  • Strong, fast fields where the dipole/scalar-potential picture fails. Minimal coupling p → p − qA must replace the bare p²/2m; a plain scalar V then misrepresents magnetic and gauge effects.
Failure modes
  • Sign/factor slips in the operators. Using p̂ = +iℏ∇ or dropping the i in iℏ∂t reverses the direction of phase evolution and breaks the correspondence ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m.
  • Treating the TDSE as second order in time “like a wave equation.” It is first order; assuming you also need ∂tΨ(t0) as data is wrong and doubles the (spurious) solution space.
  • Forcing Ψ to be real. A cosine is a sum of two counter-propagating exponentials with opposite p; it is not a momentum eigenstate and has zero net current.
  • Plugging E = ½mv² numbers into ℏω while using group velocity vg as phase velocity. For matter waves vphase = ω/k = v/2 ≠ vg = dω/dk = v; confusing them mislocates the particle.
  • Assuming stationary states are static. ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏ has time-dependent phase; only |Ψ|² is static. Superposing two energies restores visible time dependence.
  • Adding a complex V casually. Doing so silently violates norm conservation; legitimate only as an effective absorbing model, never for a closed system.
Discussion

The derivation is really a construction under constraints. Demanding linearity, first-order time evolution, and consistency with p = ℏk, E = ℏω for free waves leaves essentially no freedom: the operator dictionary E → iℏ∂t, p → −iℏ∇ is forced, and applying it to the classical energy relation E = p²/2m + V writes the equation for you. What cannot be derived this way is the interaction structure — that we borrow the classical Hamiltonian is a genuine postulate, justified after the fact by agreement with experiment (hydrogen spectrum, tunnelling rates, and so on).

The imaginary unit is not cosmetic. It converts a would-be diffusion equation (∂tΨ = D∇²Ψ, which damps) into a unitary one whose solutions oscillate and interfere. Continuity ∂t|Ψ|² + ∇·j = 0 with j = (ℏ/m)Im(Ψ*∇Ψ) then guarantees that total probability is conserved — a direct consequence of V being real and Ĥ Hermitian.

Structurally, the TDSE says iℏ∂tΨ = ĤΨ generates a one-parameter unitary group Û(t) = e−iĤt/ℏ (for time-independent Ĥ), so Ĥ is the generator of time translations exactly as momentum generates space translations. This places the equation inside the general framework in which observables are Hermitian generators of symmetries; the specific −ℏ²∇²/2m + V is just one Hamiltonian, and the same evolution law governs spin, many-body, and field systems once Ĥ is chosen appropriately. Nothing in the derivation privileges the position representation; it is the Schrödinger-picture, coordinate-basis face of the abstract law iℏ d|Ψ⟩/dt = Ĥ|Ψ⟩.

Common misconceptions. The TDSE is not derived from Newton’s laws — it is a new axiom that reduces to them in the ℏ → 0 limit. And Ψ is not a physical wave in space like sound or light; it is a complex probability amplitude whose modulus-squared, not the field itself, is observable.

Worked examples
1
Free electron: verify the dispersion. An electron is prepared as a plane wave with de Broglie wavelength λ = 0.50 nm. Find ω from the TDSE dispersion and compare E with the kinetic energy.
Symbols: k = 2π/λ, ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m ⇒ ω = ℏk²/2m, E = ℏω. A
2
k = 2π/(0.50×10−9 m) = 1.257×1010 m−1
Insert λ. A
3
ω = ℏk²/2m = (1.055×10−34)(1.257×1010)² / (2×9.11×10−31)
Insert ℏ = 1.055×10−34 J·s, m = 9.11×10−31 kg. A
4
ω = (1.055×10−34)(1.580×1020)/(1.822×10−30) = 9.15×1015 rad·s−1
Arithmetic. A
ω ≈ 9.15×1015 rad/s,  E = ℏω ≈ 9.65×10−19 J ≈ 6.0 eV

Reading. Cross-check via kinetic energy: E = ℏ²k²/2m = p²/2m with p = ℏk = 1.326×10−24 kg·m/s gives E = (1.326×10−24)²/(1.822×10−30) = 9.65×10−19 J. The frequency demanded by the TDSE and the kinetic energy agree exactly, as the construction guarantees.

1
Two-level phase beating. A particle is Ψ = (1/√2)(ψ1e−iE1t/ℏ + ψ2e−iE2t/ℏ) with E2 − E1 = 2.00 eV. Find the oscillation period of |Ψ|².
Each term evolves by its own phase (TDSE, stationary states); interference term goes as cos[(E2−E1)t/ℏ]. B
2
ωbeat = (E2 − E1)/ℏ,   T = 2πℏ/(E2−E1) = h/(E2−E1)
Rearrange for period before numbers. A
3
ΔE = 2.00 eV = 2.00×1.602×10−19 J = 3.204×10−19 J
Convert to SI. A
4
T = (6.626×10−34 J·s)/(3.204×10−19 J)
Insert h = 6.626×10−34 J·s. A
T = 2.07×10−15 s ≈ 2.07 fs

Reading. Although each stationary state has a static |ψi|², their superposition’s probability density oscillates at the Bohr frequency set by the energy gap — the physical clock behind atomic transitions. Units: J·s / J = s. A 2 eV gap (visible-light scale) gives femtosecond beating, consistent with optical periods.

Problems
  1. Show explicitly that Ψ = A ei(kx−ωt) solves the 1-D free TDSE only if ω = ℏk²/2m.
    Solution Compute iℏ∂tΨ = iℏ(−iω)Ψ = ℏωΨ and −(ℏ²/2m)∂x²Ψ = −(ℏ²/2m)(ik)²Ψ = (ℏ²k²/2m)Ψ. Equality for all x,t requires ℏω = ℏ²k²/2m, i.e. ω = ℏk²/2m. This is exactly E = p²/2m under E=ℏω, p=ℏk.
  2. For a matter wave show the phase velocity is vp = ω/k and the group velocity vg = dω/dk, and evaluate their ratio. Which equals the classical particle speed?
    Solution With ω = ℏk²/2m: vp = ω/k = ℏk/2m = p/2m = v/2. vg = dω/dk = ℏk/m = p/m = v. Ratio vp/vg = 1/2. The group velocity vg = v equals the classical particle speed; the phase velocity is unobservable and half as large.
  3. A proton (m = 1.673×10−27 kg) has kinetic energy 1.00 keV. Find its de Broglie wavelength and the angular frequency the TDSE assigns to its plane wave.
    Solution E = 1.00 keV = 1.602×10−16 J. p = √(2mE) = √(2×1.673×10−27×1.602×10−16) = √(5.360×10−43) = 7.32×10−22 kg·m/s. λ = h/p = 6.626×10−34/7.32×10−22 = 9.05×10−13 m (0.905 pm). ω = E/ℏ = 1.602×10−16/1.055×10−34 = 1.52×1018 rad/s.
  4. Starting from the 3-D TDSE with time-independent V(r), use separation of variables Ψ = ψ(r)T(t) to derive the time-independent Schrödinger equation and the form of T(t).
    Solution Substitute: iℏψT′ = [−(ℏ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ]T. Divide by ψT: iℏT′/T = [−(ℏ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ]/ψ. LHS depends only on t, RHS only on r, so both equal a constant E. Then iℏT′ = ET ⇒ T(t) = e−iEt/ℏ, and −(ℏ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ = Eψ, the TISE. Hence Ψ = ψ(r)e−iEt/ℏ and |Ψ|² = |ψ|² is stationary.
  5. Derive the continuity equation ∂tρ + ∇·j = 0 from the TDSE with real V, identifying ρ and j. Explain why a complex V breaks it.
    Solution Let ρ = Ψ*Ψ. Then ∂tρ = Ψ*∂tΨ + Ψ∂tΨ*. From the TDSE, ∂tΨ = (1/iℏ)[−(ℏ²/2m)∇²Ψ + VΨ] and its conjugate (with V* = V). Substituting, the V terms cancel and ∂tρ = (iℏ/2m)(Ψ*∇²Ψ − Ψ∇²Ψ*) = −∇·j with j = (ℏ/2mi)(Ψ*∇Ψ − Ψ∇Ψ*) = (ℏ/m)Im(Ψ*∇Ψ). If V = VR + iVI, the V terms leave a residue ∂tρ + ∇·j = (2VI/ℏ)ρ ≠ 0, so total probability is not conserved — the model gains or loses particles.