physics2u
Tier
⌕ Search ⌘K
Derivation

Reciprocal Lattice from the Bravais Lattice

D-247 Home PU-303 Threads matter · symmetry · waves Depends on fourier-series-completeness
Statement

Given a Bravais lattice \(\{\vec{R} = n_1\vec{a}_1 + n_2\vec{a}_2 + n_3\vec{a}_3 : n_i \in \mathbb{Z}\}\) with primitive vectors \(\vec{a}_1,\vec{a}_2,\vec{a}_3\), the reciprocal lattice is the set of wavevectors \(\vec{G}\) for which the plane wave \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{r}}\) has the periodicity of the lattice, i.e. \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}} = 1\) for every \(\vec{R}\). This set is itself a Bravais lattice, spanned by primitive vectors \(\vec{b}_i = 2\pi\,\dfrac{\vec{a}_j\times\vec{a}_k}{\vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3)}\) (with \(i,j,k\) cyclic), satisfying \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j = 2\pi\,\delta_{ij}\).

Why it matters

The reciprocal lattice is the natural arena for everything wave-like in a crystal. Because any lattice-periodic function admits a Fourier expansion whose only surviving wavevectors are the reciprocal lattice vectors, the reciprocal lattice controls X-ray and neutron diffraction (the Laue and Bragg conditions are statements about \(\vec{G}\)), the classification of electronic states by crystal momentum, and the geometry of Brillouin zones.

Conceptually it is the Fourier dual of the direct lattice: distances in real space map to inverse distances in \(\vec{k}\)-space, and the point-group symmetry of the crystal is faithfully reproduced. Master the reciprocal lattice once and the same object reappears in band structure, phonons, and pseudopotentials.

Assumptions
The lattice is an ideal, infinite Bravais lattice.If finite, the allowed \(\vec{G}\) broaden into a continuum of finite width \(\sim 2\pi/L\); diffraction peaks acquire nonzero width and the reciprocal lattice becomes only approximately discrete.
The primitive vectors are linearly independent (non-coplanar), so the cell volume \(v = \vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3)\neq 0\).If \(v=0\) the vectors span fewer than three dimensions and the division defining \(\vec{b}_i\) is undefined; the construction must be redone in the correct dimensionality.
We demand phase equal to unity, not merely a common phase, on all lattice points.If dropped and only a fixed nonzero phase were required, the "reciprocal lattice" would not close under addition and would fail to be a Bravais lattice; unit phase is what makes \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{r}}\) genuinely lattice-periodic.
Space is Euclidean \(\mathbb{R}^3\) with the standard scalar product.On a curved or non-orthonormal metric manifold the cross-product construction fails; one must instead build \(\vec{b}_i\) from the inverse of the metric-weighted overlap matrix \(a_i\cdot a_j\).
Derivation
1
\[ f(\vec{r}) = f(\vec{r}+\vec{R}) \quad \text{for all } \vec{R} \]
A crystal's charge density, potential, or any physical field inherits the discrete translational symmetry of the Bravais lattice. This periodicity is the defining property we will Fourier-analyse. A
2
\[ f(\vec{r}) = \sum_{\vec{k}} f_{\vec{k}}\, e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}} \]
By completeness of the Fourier basis (assumed prior result), any well-behaved function on \(\mathbb{R}^3\) can be written as a superposition of plane waves. We now ask which \(\vec{k}\) are compatible with the periodicity of Step 1. A
3
\[ \sum_{\vec{k}} f_{\vec{k}}\, e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}} = \sum_{\vec{k}} f_{\vec{k}}\, e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}\,e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{R}} \]
Substitute the expansion into \(f(\vec{r})=f(\vec{r}+\vec{R})\) and factor the shift \(e^{i\vec{k}\cdot(\vec{r}+\vec{R})}=e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{R}}\). Equality must hold as functions of \(\vec{r}\). A
4
\[ e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{R}} = 1 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \vec{k}\cdot\vec{R} = 2\pi m,\ \ m\in\mathbb{Z} \]
Because the plane waves \(e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}\) are linearly independent, matching coefficients forces each contributing \(\vec{k}\) to satisfy \(e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{R}}=1\) for every \(\vec{R}\). We name the wavevectors obeying this condition \(\vec{G}\); they are the reciprocal lattice. B
5
\[ \vec{G}\cdot(n_1\vec{a}_1+n_2\vec{a}_2+n_3\vec{a}_3) \in 2\pi\mathbb{Z}\ \ \forall\, n_i\in\mathbb{Z} \;\Longleftrightarrow\; \vec{G}\cdot\vec{a}_i \in 2\pi\mathbb{Z}\ \ (i=1,2,3) \]
Writing \(\vec{R}=\sum_i n_i\vec{a}_i\), the condition on all \(\vec{R}\) reduces to a condition on the three generators: if \(\vec{G}\cdot\vec{a}_i=2\pi m_i\) then \(\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}=2\pi\sum_i n_i m_i\in2\pi\mathbb{Z}\) automatically, and conversely taking \(\vec{R}=\vec{a}_i\) shows each \(\vec{G}\cdot\vec{a}_i\) is an integer multiple of \(2\pi\). Integer linearity is the crux. C
6
\[ \vec{G} = h\,\vec{b}_1 + k\,\vec{b}_2 + \ell\,\vec{b}_3,\qquad \vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j = 2\pi\,\delta_{ij} \]
Expand the unknown \(\vec{G}\) in an as-yet-undetermined basis \(\{\vec{b}_j\}\) dual to \(\{\vec{a}_i\}\). If the duals satisfy \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j=2\pi\delta_{ij}\), then \(\vec{G}\cdot\vec{a}_i = 2\pi\,(\text{integer})\) holds precisely when the coefficients \(h,k,\ell\) are integers, exactly reproducing Step 5. It remains to construct such \(\vec{b}_j\). B
7
\[ \vec{b}_1 = \lambda\,(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3) \]
We require \(\vec{b}_1\perp\vec{a}_2\) and \(\vec{b}_1\perp\vec{a}_3\) (so that \(\vec{a}_2\cdot\vec{b}_1=\vec{a}_3\cdot\vec{b}_1=0\)). The unique direction orthogonal to both \(\vec{a}_2\) and \(\vec{a}_3\) is that of their cross product, so \(\vec{b}_1\) must be parallel to \(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3\); \(\lambda\) is a scalar fixed next. C
8
\[ \vec{a}_1\cdot\vec{b}_1 = \lambda\,\vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3) = 2\pi \;\Longrightarrow\; \lambda = \frac{2\pi}{\vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3)} \]
Impose the remaining normalisation \(\vec{a}_1\cdot\vec{b}_1=2\pi\). The scalar triple product \(v=\vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3)\) is the direct-cell volume, nonzero by assumption, so \(\lambda\) is well defined. B
9
\[ \boxed{\;\vec{b}_1 = 2\pi\,\frac{\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3}{v},\quad \vec{b}_2 = 2\pi\,\frac{\vec{a}_3\times\vec{a}_1}{v},\quad \vec{b}_3 = 2\pi\,\frac{\vec{a}_1\times\vec{a}_2}{v}\;} \]
Repeating Steps 7–8 with cyclic permutations \((1,2,3)\to(2,3,1)\to(3,1,2)\) yields all three primitive reciprocal vectors. One verifies directly that \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j=2\pi\delta_{ij}\): the diagonal gives \(2\pi v/v\) and off-diagonal terms vanish because a cross product is orthogonal to its factors. B
10
\[ \{\vec{G} = h\vec{b}_1+k\vec{b}_2+\ell\vec{b}_3 : h,k,\ell\in\mathbb{Z}\} \]
The reciprocal lattice is the integer span of \(\{\vec{b}_1,\vec{b}_2,\vec{b}_3\}\): closed under addition and inversion, hence itself a Bravais lattice. This is the promised construction. A
Result
\[ \vec{b}_i = 2\pi\,\frac{\vec{a}_j\times\vec{a}_k}{\vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3)}\ \ (ijk\ \text{cyclic}),\qquad \vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j = 2\pi\,\delta_{ij} \]

Reading. The three reciprocal primitive vectors are the "biorthogonal dual" of the direct primitive vectors: \(\vec{b}_i\) points perpendicular to the plane spanned by the other two direct vectors, and its length is scaled so that its projection onto \(\vec{a}_i\) equals \(2\pi\). The integer combinations of the \(\vec{b}_i\) are exactly the wavevectors whose plane waves are invisible to (periodic on) the lattice. The factor \(2\pi\) is a convention of solid-state physics; crystallographers often drop it, replacing \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}}=1\) by \(\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}\in\mathbb{Z}\).

Units check. The \(\vec{a}_i\) carry units of length (m). A cross product \(\vec{a}_j\times\vec{a}_k\) has units m\(^2\); the triple product \(v\) has units m\(^3\). Hence \([\vec{b}_i] = \text{m}^2/\text{m}^3 = \text{m}^{-1}\), a wavevector, as required. The dimensionless \(2\pi\) leaves this unchanged, and \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j\) is (m)(m\(^{-1}\)) = dimensionless, consistent with appearing in an exponent.

Limiting cases
  • Simple cubic, edge \(a\). \(\vec{a}_i = a\hat{e}_i\Rightarrow\vec{b}_i = (2\pi/a)\hat{e}_i\): reciprocal lattice is again simple cubic with edge \(2\pi/a\). Large real-space spacing \(\to\) small reciprocal spacing.
  • Orthorhombic. \(\vec{a}_i=a_i\hat{e}_i\Rightarrow\vec{b}_i=(2\pi/a_i)\hat{e}_i\): each axis inverts independently; the reciprocal cell is stretched where the direct cell is squeezed.
  • FCC \(\leftrightarrow\) BCC. The reciprocal of a face-centred cubic lattice is body-centred cubic (and vice versa); the conventional-cube edges relate as \(a_{\text{rec}} = 4\pi/a\).
  • Self-dual scaling. Applying the construction twice returns the original lattice up to the factor \((2\pi)^2\): the reciprocal of the reciprocal lattice is the direct lattice.
  • 2D limit. For a planar lattice one embeds an auxiliary unit normal \(\hat{n}\) as \(\vec{a}_3=\hat{n}\); then \(\vec{b}_1 = 2\pi(\vec{a}_2\times\hat{n})/[\hat{n}\cdot(\vec{a}_1\times\vec{a}_2)]\), the standard 2D result.
Breaks when
  • Quasicrystals and incommensurate structures. There is no underlying Bravais lattice, so no finite set of primitive \(\vec{b}_i\) exists. Diffraction still shows sharp spots, but they fill a dense set indexed by more than three integers (a projection from a higher-dimensional lattice), and the cross-product formula does not apply.
  • Finite or disordered crystals. Translational symmetry is only approximate. The delta-function condition \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}}=1\) softens: reciprocal "points" acquire finite width \(\sim2\pi/L\) (size broadening) or diffuse scattering (disorder), and the discrete reciprocal lattice is an idealisation.
  • Non-Euclidean or strained metrics. Under inhomogeneous strain the "primitive vectors" vary with position; a single global reciprocal lattice is ill-defined and one must work with a locally varying \(\vec{b}_i(\vec{r})\) or a strain-deformed reciprocal map.
  • Degenerate cell (\(v\to0\)). Nearly coplanar \(\vec{a}_i\) send \(|\vec{b}_i|\to\infty\); the reciprocal lattice ceases to be well conditioned, signalling that the true dimensionality is lower.
Failure modes
  • Dropping the \(2\pi\). Mixing the physicist convention \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j=2\pi\delta_{ij}\) with the crystallographer convention \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_j=\delta_{ij}\) within one calculation. Diffraction conditions then come out wrong by factors of \(2\pi\).
  • Inverting component-wise. Believing \(\vec{b}_i = 2\pi/\vec{a}_i\) component by component. This is only true for orthogonal axes; for oblique cells \(\vec{b}_i\) is generally not parallel to \(\vec{a}_i\).
  • Wrong cyclic partner. Writing \(\vec{b}_1\propto\vec{a}_1\times\vec{a}_2\) instead of \(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3\). Always pair \(\vec{b}_i\) with the cross product of the two direct vectors it is NOT dual to.
  • Sign of the triple product. Using \(|v|\) blindly for a left-handed set \(\vec{a}_i\); the signed \(v\) keeps \(\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{b}_i=+2\pi\), whereas \(|v|\) can flip a sign and corrupt orientation.
  • Confusing conventional and primitive cells. Building \(\vec{b}_i\) from the conventional cubic vectors of FCC/BCC rather than the primitive rhombohedral ones, producing a reciprocal lattice with spurious "extra" points that are actually forbidden reflections.
Discussion

The reciprocal lattice is the shadow the direct lattice casts in Fourier space. Its deepest justification is the one used above: a lattice-periodic function has a Fourier series, and periodicity restricts the sum to run over precisely those wavevectors \(\vec{G}\) with \(e^{i\vec{G}\cdot\vec{R}}=1\). Every physical consequence flows from this. In diffraction, the scattered amplitude from a crystal is the Fourier transform of its density, which is a sum of delta functions located at the \(\vec{G}\); constructive interference (the Laue condition \(\Delta\vec{k}=\vec{G}\)) happens only at reciprocal lattice points, and the equivalent Bragg law \(2d\sin\theta=n\lambda\) is recovered because \(|\vec{G}_{hk\ell}| = 2\pi/d_{hk\ell}\) relates reciprocal vector length to interplanar spacing.

The construction also carries symmetry faithfully. Because \(\vec{b}_i\) are built from \(\vec{a}_i\) by operations (cross product, scalar triple product) that commute with rotations, any point-group operation that leaves the direct lattice invariant leaves the reciprocal lattice invariant too. This is why the Brillouin zone — the Wigner–Seitz primitive cell of the reciprocal lattice — has the full point-group symmetry of the crystal, and why band structures and phonon dispersions are plotted along its high-symmetry directions.

A more abstract reading: the \(\vec{b}_i\) are the dual basis of the \(\vec{a}_i\) with respect to the scalar product, up to the factor \(2\pi\). In matrix form, if \(A=[\vec{a}_1\ \vec{a}_2\ \vec{a}_3]\) has the direct vectors as columns and \(B=[\vec{b}_1\ \vec{b}_2\ \vec{b}_3]\), then \(A^{\mathsf T}B = 2\pi\,\mathbb{1}\), so \(B = 2\pi (A^{\mathsf T})^{-1} = 2\pi (A^{-1})^{\mathsf T}\). The cross-product formulas are simply Cramer's rule applied to this inverse, which is why they generalise cleanly to any dimension via the metric tensor \(g_{ij}=\vec{a}_i\cdot\vec{a}_j\): \(\vec{b}_i = 2\pi\sum_j (g^{-1})_{ij}\,\vec{a}_j\). This viewpoint makes it manifest that the reciprocal-of-reciprocal returns the direct lattice, since \(((A^{-1})^{\mathsf T})^{-1\,\mathsf T}=A\).

Common misconceptions. The reciprocal lattice is not "the crystal in momentum space" in the sense of where electrons live — that is the Brillouin zone, a single primitive cell of it. Nor is a reciprocal lattice vector the same as a general crystal momentum \(\vec{k}\); the \(\vec{G}\) are the special \(\vec{k}\) that are lattice-periodic and connect physically equivalent states \(\vec{k}\) and \(\vec{k}+\vec{G}\). Finally, the reciprocal lattice depends only on the Bravais lattice, not on the basis of atoms decorating it — the atomic basis enters diffraction through the structure factor (which can extinguish spots) but never changes the positions of the reciprocal lattice points.

Worked examples
1
\[ \text{2D hexagonal (graphene) lattice: } \vec{a}_1 = a\!\left(\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2},\tfrac12\right),\ \vec{a}_2 = a\!\left(\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2},-\tfrac12\right) \]
Take the graphene lattice constant \(a=2.46\ \text{Å}\). Embed a unit normal \(\hat{a}_3=\hat{z}\) to apply the 3D formulas in the plane. A
2
\[ v = |\vec{a}_1\times\vec{a}_2| = a^2\left|\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2}\!\cdot\!\left(-\tfrac12\right) - \tfrac12\!\cdot\!\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2}\right| = \frac{\sqrt3}{2}\,a^2 \]
The signed area of the 2D cell equals the \(z\)-component of \(\vec{a}_1\times\vec{a}_2\); this magnitude \(\tfrac{\sqrt3}{2}a^2\) plays the role of the cell volume \(v\) in the reciprocal formulas. B
3
\[ \vec{b}_1 = 2\pi\frac{\vec{a}_2\times\hat z}{v} = \frac{2\pi}{a}\!\left(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt3},1\right),\quad \vec{b}_2 = \frac{2\pi}{a}\!\left(\tfrac{1}{\sqrt3},-1\right) \]
Carrying out the cross products with \(\hat z\) rotates each direct vector by \(90^\circ\) and divides by \(v\). Symbolic form first. B
4
\[ |\vec{b}_1| = \frac{2\pi}{a}\sqrt{\tfrac13+1} = \frac{2\pi}{a}\cdot\frac{2}{\sqrt3} = \frac{4\pi}{\sqrt3\,a} \]
Now insert \(a=2.46\times10^{-10}\ \text{m}\): \(|\vec{b}_1| = \dfrac{4\pi}{\sqrt3\,(2.46\times10^{-10})} \approx 2.95\times10^{10}\ \text{m}^{-1} = 2.95\ \text{Å}^{-1}\). A
\[ |\vec{b}_1|=|\vec{b}_2| \approx 2.95\ \text{Å}^{-1},\qquad \angle(\vec{b}_1,\vec{b}_2)=60^\circ \]

Reading. The reciprocal lattice of the hexagonal direct lattice is again hexagonal, rotated \(30^\circ\), with the \(K\) and \(K'\) valleys of graphene sitting at its corners. Units check. \(\text{Å}^{-1}\) is inverse length, correct for a wavevector.

1
\[ \text{FCC lattice, primitive vectors } \vec{a}_1=\tfrac{a}{2}(0,1,1),\ \vec{a}_2=\tfrac{a}{2}(1,0,1),\ \vec{a}_3=\tfrac{a}{2}(1,1,0) \]
Use copper, conventional cube edge \(a=3.61\ \text{Å}\). We compute its reciprocal lattice and show it is BCC. A
2
\[ v = \vec{a}_1\cdot(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3) = \frac{a^3}{8}\,\bigl[(0,1,1)\cdot\bigl((1,0,1)\times(1,1,0)\bigr)\bigr] = \frac{a^3}{8}\cdot 2 = \frac{a^3}{4} \]
The primitive FCC cell has one quarter the volume of the conventional cube, as expected for four lattice points per cube. B
3
\[ \vec{b}_1 = 2\pi\frac{\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3}{v} = \frac{2\pi}{a}(-1,1,1),\quad \vec{b}_2 = \frac{2\pi}{a}(1,-1,1),\quad \vec{b}_3=\frac{2\pi}{a}(1,1,-1) \]
\(\vec{a}_2\times\vec{a}_3 = \tfrac{a^2}{4}(-1,1,1)\); dividing by \(v=a^3/4\) and multiplying by \(2\pi\) gives \(\tfrac{2\pi}{a}(-1,1,1)\). These are the primitive vectors of a body-centred cubic lattice with conventional edge \(4\pi/a\). B
4
\[ |\vec{b}_1| = \frac{2\pi}{a}\sqrt{3} = \frac{2\pi\sqrt3}{3.61\times10^{-10}\ \text{m}} \approx 3.01\times10^{10}\ \text{m}^{-1} \]
Insert \(a=3.61\ \text{Å}\). Each reciprocal primitive vector has length \(2\pi\sqrt3/a\approx3.01\ \text{Å}^{-1}\). A
\[ \text{Reciprocal of FCC} = \text{BCC},\qquad |\vec{b}_i|\approx 3.01\ \text{Å}^{-1},\quad a_{\text{rec}} = \frac{4\pi}{a}\approx3.48\ \text{Å}^{-1} \]

Reading. Copper's reciprocal lattice is BCC; its Wigner–Seitz cell is the truncated octahedron, the first Brillouin zone of the FCC metals. Units check. \(2\pi\sqrt3/a\) has units \(1/\text{m}\); numerically \(\approx3.0\times10^{10}\ \text{m}^{-1}\), a typical reciprocal-lattice scale.

Problems
  1. (A) Cubic reciprocal. A simple cubic lattice has \(a=4.00\ \text{Å}\). Find \(|\vec{b}_i|\) and the volume of the reciprocal primitive cell.
    Solution

    \(\vec{b}_i=(2\pi/a)\hat e_i\), so \(|\vec{b}_i| = 2\pi/(4.00\times10^{-10}) = 1.571\times10^{10}\ \text{m}^{-1} = 1.57\ \text{Å}^{-1}\). Reciprocal cell volume \(= (2\pi/a)^3 = (2\pi)^3/v\). With \(v=a^3=64\ \text{Å}^3\): \(V_{\text{rec}} = (1.571)^3 = 3.88\ \text{Å}^{-3}\). Check: \(V_{\text{rec}} = (2\pi)^3/v = 248.05/64 = 3.88\ \text{Å}^{-3}\). ✓

  2. (A) Reciprocal cell volume identity. Prove that \(V_{\text{rec}} = \vec{b}_1\cdot(\vec{b}_2\times\vec{b}_3) = (2\pi)^3/v\) for any Bravais lattice.
    Solution

    Using \(\vec b_i = 2\pi(A^{\mathsf T})^{-1}\) columns, \(\det B = (2\pi)^3\det(A^{\mathsf T})^{-1} = (2\pi)^3/\det A = (2\pi)^3/v\). Since \(\det B = \vec b_1\cdot(\vec b_2\times\vec b_3)\), the result follows. Alternatively substitute the cross-product forms and use the vector identity \((\vec a_2\times\vec a_3)\cdot[(\vec a_3\times\vec a_1)\times(\vec a_1\times\vec a_2)] = v^2\), giving \(V_{\text{rec}} = (2\pi)^3 v^2/v^3 = (2\pi)^3/v\). ✓

  3. (B) Interplanar spacing. Show that the family of lattice planes \((h k \ell)\) has spacing \(d_{hk\ell} = 2\pi/|\vec{G}_{hk\ell}|\), and evaluate \(d_{111}\) for copper's FCC lattice using the reciprocal vectors found above (\(a=3.61\ \text{Å}\)).
    Solution

    \(\vec G_{hk\ell}=h\vec b_1+k\vec b_2+\ell\vec b_3\) is perpendicular to the \((hk\ell)\) planes, and successive planes differ in phase by \(2\pi\), so their spacing is \(d=2\pi/|\vec G|\). For the \((111)\) plane referred to the FCC primitive basis, \(\vec G_{111} = \vec b_1+\vec b_2+\vec b_3 = \tfrac{2\pi}{a}(1,1,1)\), giving \(|\vec G_{111}| = 2\pi\sqrt3/a\) and \(d_{111} = 2\pi/|\vec G_{111}| = a/\sqrt3 = 3.61/\sqrt3 = 2.08\ \text{Å}\). (This is the spacing between the primitive-basis \((111)\) planes.) ✓

  4. (B) Oblique 2D lattice. A 2D lattice has \(\vec a_1 = (3,0)\ \text{Å}\) and \(\vec a_2 = (1,2)\ \text{Å}\). Find \(\vec b_1,\vec b_2\) and confirm \(\vec a_i\cdot\vec b_j = 2\pi\delta_{ij}\).
    Solution

    Cell area \(v = a_{1x}a_{2y}-a_{1y}a_{2x} = 3\cdot2-0\cdot1 = 6\ \text{Å}^2\). In 2D, \(\vec b_1 = \tfrac{2\pi}{v}(a_{2y},-a_{2x}) = \tfrac{2\pi}{6}(2,-1) = \tfrac{\pi}{3}(2,-1)\ \text{Å}^{-1}\); \(\vec b_2 = \tfrac{2\pi}{v}(-a_{1y},a_{1x}) = \tfrac{2\pi}{6}(0,3) = (0,\pi)\ \text{Å}^{-1}\). Check: \(\vec a_1\cdot\vec b_1 = (3)(\tfrac{2\pi}{3})+0 = 2\pi\) ✓; \(\vec a_1\cdot\vec b_2 = 3\cdot0+0\cdot\pi = 0\) ✓; \(\vec a_2\cdot\vec b_2 = 1\cdot0+2\pi = 2\pi\) ✓; \(\vec a_2\cdot\vec b_1 = \tfrac{2\pi}{6}(1\cdot2+2\cdot(-1)) = 0\) ✓.

  5. (C) BCC reciprocal is FCC. Starting from BCC primitive vectors \(\vec a_1=\tfrac{a}{2}(-1,1,1),\ \vec a_2=\tfrac{a}{2}(1,-1,1),\ \vec a_3=\tfrac{a}{2}(1,1,-1)\), derive the reciprocal vectors and identify the lattice type.
    Solution

    Compute \(v = \vec a_1\cdot(\vec a_2\times\vec a_3)\). \(\vec a_2\times\vec a_3 = \tfrac{a^2}{4}\big((-1)(-1)-(1)(1),\,(1)(1)-(1)(-1),\,(1)(1)-(-1)(1)\big) = \tfrac{a^2}{4}(0,2,2)\). Then \(v = \tfrac{a}{2}(-1,1,1)\cdot\tfrac{a^2}{4}(0,2,2) = \tfrac{a^3}{8}(0+2+2) = \tfrac{a^3}{2}\). Now \(\vec b_1 = 2\pi\tfrac{\vec a_2\times\vec a_3}{v} = 2\pi\tfrac{(a^2/4)(0,2,2)}{a^3/2} = \tfrac{2\pi}{a}(0,1,1)\). Cyclically, \(\vec b_2 = \tfrac{2\pi}{a}(1,0,1)\), \(\vec b_3 = \tfrac{2\pi}{a}(1,1,0)\). These are FCC primitive vectors with conventional edge \(4\pi/a\): the reciprocal of BCC is FCC, confirming the duality of Worked Example 2. ✓