Measurement, Collapse, and Spectral Expansion
~6 min read · Tier toggle changes depth (T1 plain · T2 standard · T3 rigour)
You should be comfortable with the inner product notation in Hilbert space, the definition of a Hermitian operator, and the concept of an orthonormal basis. You must also recall the generalised uncertainty relation from the previous lecture.
Why this matters
This lecture bridges the abstract mathematical formalism with the physical act of measurement.
In quantum mechanics, the state of a system is not a list of definite properties but a vector in an abstract space. To extract physical predictions, we must connect this vector to the outcomes of experiments. This connection is provided by the spectral theorem, which allows us to expand any state in terms of the eigenvectors of an observable. This expansion is not merely a mathematical convenience; it encodes the probabilities of measurement outcomes and the post-measurement state of the system. Understanding this link is essential for interpreting the quantum world and for solving the canonical problems that follow.
The Big Picture
Imagine you have a quantum state, which we represent as a vector. Now imagine an observable, such as energy or position, which is represented by a Hermitian operator. The spectral theorem tells us that the eigenvectors of this operator form a complete set of directions in our vector space. This means we can describe any possible state as a mixture, or superposition, of these specific eigenvectors. When we measure the observable, we are essentially asking which of these directions the state is pointing towards. The probability of finding a specific value is determined by how much of the state vector lies along the corresponding eigenvector. If we measure and get a specific result, the state vector instantly "snaps" to align perfectly with that eigenvector. This process is known as the collapse of the wavefunction. It is the fundamental rule that connects the smooth, deterministic evolution of the wavefunction with the discrete, probabilistic nature of measurement outcomes.
Spectral Expansion
Let \(\hat{A}\) be a Hermitian operator representing an observable with a discrete, non-degenerate spectrum \(\{a_n\}\). The eigenvectors \(|a_n\rangle\) satisfy the eigenvalue equation \(\hat{A}|a_n\rangle = a_n|a_n\rangle\) and form an orthonormal basis. This means \(\langle a_m | a_n \rangle = \delta_{mn}\). Because they form a complete basis, any normalised state \(|\psi\rangle\) can be expanded as a linear combination of these eigenvectors.
The coefficients \(c_n\) are found by taking the inner product of the state with each eigenvector. Using the orthonormality condition, we project the state onto the basis vectors:
This expansion is the mathematical foundation of the statistical interpretation. The coefficients \(c_n\) are complex numbers, but their squared magnitudes have direct physical significance.
Probability and Collapse
According to the Born rule, the probability \(P(a_n)\) of measuring the value \(a_n\) is the square of the magnitude of the coefficient \(c_n\). This is often referred to as the Born probability rule.
Since the state is normalised, the sum of all probabilities must equal one. This is a direct consequence of the completeness of the basis:
Crucially, the measurement process is not passive. If the measurement yields the outcome \(a_n\), the system is left in the corresponding eigenstate \(|a_n\rangle\). This is the projection postulate, or state collapse. Immediately after the measurement, the state is no longer the superposition \(|\psi\rangle\), but the pure eigenstate associated with the observed value.
This collapse is instantaneous and non-unitary, distinguishing it from the smooth time evolution governed by the Schrödinger equation. It represents a fundamental discontinuity in the state of the system triggered by the interaction with the measuring apparatus.
Expectation Values
While individual measurements yield discrete eigenvalues, the expectation value \(\langle \hat{A} \rangle\) gives the average result of many repeated measurements on identically prepared systems. Using the spectral expansion, we can express this expectation value in terms of the probabilities and eigenvalues.
This formula shows that the expectation value is a weighted average of the possible outcomes, where the weights are the probabilities of those outcomes. It provides a bridge between the quantum formalism and classical statistical mechanics, where averages play a central role in describing macroscopic behaviour.
The derivation
Measurement, Collapse, and Spectral Expansion
For an observable represented by a Hermitian operator  with discrete, non-degenerate spectrum {an} and orthonormal eigenvectors {|an⟩}, any normalised state expands as |ψ⟩ = Σn cn|an⟩ with cn = ⟨an|ψ⟩. A measurement of  then yields the value an with probability P(an) = |cn|² = |⟨an|ψ⟩|², and immediately after such an outcome the system is left in the corresponding eigenstate, |ψ⟩ → |an⟩.
A common misconception is that the collapse of the wavefunction is a physical process that propagates through space at a finite speed. Whatever collapse is (interpretations differ: an update of information, a physical process, or a branching), it cannot be used to send a signal. For two entangled particles, the statistics of measurements made on one are unchanged by anything done to the other, so quantum mechanics does not let information travel faster than light. C
Worked example
Problem. Consider a spin-1/2 particle in the state \(|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}|+\rangle + \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}|-\rangle\), where \(|+\rangle\) and \(|-\rangle\) are the eigenstates of the spin operator \(\hat{S}_z\) with eigenvalues \(+\hbar/2\) and \(-\hbar/2\) respectively. Calculate the probability of measuring \(S_z = \hbar/2\) and the expectation value of \(S_z\).
- Identify the coefficients: \(c_+ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\) and \(c_- = \frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\).
- Calculate the probability of measuring \(+\hbar/2\): \(P(+) = |c_+|^2 = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{5}\).
- Calculate the probability of measuring \(-\hbar/2\): \(P(-) = |c_-|^2 = \left(\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\right)^2 = \frac{4}{5}\).
- Calculate the expectation value: \(\langle S_z \rangle = (+\hbar/2)P(+) + (-\hbar/2)P(-)\).
- Substitute the values: \(\langle S_z \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\left(\frac{1}{5}\right) - \frac{\hbar}{2}\left(\frac{4}{5}\right) = \frac{\hbar}{10} - \frac{4\hbar}{10} = -\frac{3\hbar}{10}\).
Units check. The probability is dimensionless. The expectation value has units of angular momentum, consistent with \(\hbar\).
Three quick tests
- What is the probability of measuring an eigenvalue \(a_n\) if the state is already in the eigenstate \(|a_n\rangle\)?
Answer
The probability is 1, since \(|\langle a_n | a_n \rangle|^2 = 1\). - If a measurement of \(\hat{A}\) yields \(a_1\), what is the state of the system immediately after?
Answer
The system is in the eigenstate \(|a_1\rangle\). - Why must the sum of all probabilities \(P(a_n)\) equal 1?
Answer
Because the state vector is normalised and the eigenvectors form a complete orthonormal basis.
Problem set for PU-202 →
Each derivation in this unit ends with five graded problems with full solutions.
Lecture notes drafted with a local model and checked line by line by the editor; every number in the worked example was recomputed.