Concept

Synaptic transmission

T-071Home BU-302Threads regulation · systems

Statement

Chemical communication across the synapse.

Why it matters

action-potential describes how an electrical signal travels the length of a single neuron, but a signal has to cross the gap to the next cell to be of any use in a nervous system with more than one neuron; synaptic transmission is the mechanism that bridges that gap. Because most synapses are chemical rather than electrical, the arriving all-or-nothing electrical spike must first be converted into a chemical signal and then converted back into an electrical one on the other side — a two-step relay whose properties (delay, directionality, and modifiability) shape nearly everything the nervous system can do.

This chemical relay is also the point at which the vast majority of clinically and pharmacologically relevant drugs acting on the nervous system intervene, and it is the physical substrate for neural-integration, since a neuron's decision to fire depends on summing many such synaptic inputs arriving simultaneously.

Hypotheses

The presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons are separated by a physical gap, the synaptic cleft, with no direct cytoplasmic continuity between them.Because there is no direct electrical continuity across a chemical synapse, the action potential itself cannot simply "jump" the gap; some intermediary signal must physically cross the cleft, which is what necessitates the vesicle-release mechanism developed below rather than a purely electrical handoff (as occurs at the much rarer electrical synapses, connected instead by gap junctions). Neurotransmitter is stored in the presynaptic terminal in membrane-bound vesicles and released by calcium-triggered exocytosis specifically in response to the arriving action potential.Storing neurotransmitter in discrete, pre-packaged vesicles (rather than releasing it continuously from a free cytoplasmic pool) is what allows release to be sharply time-locked to the arrival of an action potential, giving synaptic transmission millisecond-scale precision rather than a slow, continuous leak. Postsynaptic receptors are specific to their neurotransmitter and can be either ionotropic (directly gating an ion channel) or metabotropic (acting via a G-protein-coupled second-messenger cascade, signal-transduction).This distinction determines the postsynaptic response's speed and duration: ionotropic receptors produce fast (millisecond-scale) but brief postsynaptic potentials, while metabotropic receptors produce slower-onset but longer-lasting and more modifiable effects, via the amplifying intracellular cascade developed separately in signal-transduction.

Proof

\[ \text{An arriving action potential depolarises the presynaptic terminal, opening voltage-gated calcium channels.} \]

The same voltage-gated-channel logic that generates the action potential itself (action-potential) recurs here: depolarisation opens channels selective for \(\text{Ca}^{2+}\), which is normally maintained at a much lower concentration inside the cell than outside, so the electrochemical gradient drives a sharp, transient calcium influx precisely timed to the spike's arrival. A

\[ \text{The resulting local rise in intracellular Ca}^{2+}\text{ triggers synaptic vesicles to fuse with the presynaptic membrane, releasing neurotransmitter into the cleft by exocytosis.} \]

Calcium binds specific vesicle-associated proteins that trigger membrane fusion; because vesicle content is released essentially all-at-once per fusion event (quantal release), postsynaptic response strength depends on how many vesicles fuse, not on a continuously variable release rate. A

\[ \text{Neurotransmitter diffuses across the narrow synaptic cleft and binds postsynaptic receptors specific to it.} \]

Diffusion across the roughly 20-nanometre cleft is fast on the relevant timescale, but still introduces the small synaptic delay (typically under a millisecond) that distinguishes chemical synaptic transmission's speed from the near-instantaneous transmission of an electrical synapse. A

\[ \text{Receptor binding produces a postsynaptic potential: excitatory (depolarising, from cation-permeable ionotropic receptors) or inhibitory (hyperpolarising, typically from Cl}^-\text{- or K}^+\text{-permeable receptors), depending on receptor and ion type.} \]

Which ions the activated receptor's channel is permeable to (directly, for ionotropic receptors, or via a downstream cascade for metabotropic receptors, Hypotheses) determines the sign and magnitude of the resulting membrane-potential change; the same neurotransmitter can be excitatory at one receptor subtype and inhibitory at another, so it is the receptor, not the transmitter alone, that determines the postsynaptic sign. A

\[ \text{Neurotransmitter is rapidly removed from the cleft, by enzymatic degradation, reuptake into the presynaptic terminal, or diffusion away, terminating the signal.} \]

Without active removal, neurotransmitter would remain bound (or continue rebinding) at postsynaptic receptors indefinitely, and the postsynaptic potential could not return to baseline in time for the synapse to transmit a distinct, separate signal on the next arriving action potential. A

Result

\[ \text{Presynaptic spike} \to \text{Ca}^{2+}\text{ influx} \to \text{vesicle fusion} \to \text{transmitter diffusion} \to \text{postsynaptic receptor binding} \to \text{EPSP/IPSP} \]

Reading. An electrical signal is converted to a chemical one and back to an electrical one across the synaptic cleft, a five-step relay that introduces a small, fixed delay but gains, in exchange, the ability to be excitatory or inhibitory, to vary in strength with use, and to be modulated pharmacologically at multiple distinct points.

Scope. Describes chemical synaptic transmission specifically; electrical synapses (via gap junctions, Hypotheses) bypass essentially all five steps, transmitting current directly and near-instantaneously, at the cost of losing the sign-flexibility and modifiability chemical synapses provide.

Corollaries & converses

neural-integration's summation of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (Step 4) at the postsynaptic neuron's cell body is the direct next stage of processing built on top of synaptic transmission, converting many individual synaptic events into a single, integrated decision of whether that neuron fires.
long-term-potentiation's use-dependent strengthening of a synapse operates by modifying the efficiency of one or more of Steps 1–4 (commonly increasing postsynaptic receptor number or sensitivity, Step 4), showing that this five-step relay is not a fixed pipeline but one whose gain can itself be adjusted by prior activity.
Converse: a drug or toxin that blocks any single step of the Proof (blocking presynaptic calcium channels, blocking vesicle fusion, blocking the postsynaptic receptor, or blocking reuptake/degradation) is sufficient to disrupt transmission at that synapse entirely or partially, which is precisely why so many neuroactive drugs and toxins are classified by which specific step of this pathway they target.

Fails without

Drop calcium-triggered, quantal vesicle release (Hypotheses, Step 2): without a sharp, calcium-gated release mechanism, neurotransmitter release would not be tightly time-locked to the arrival of an action potential; postsynaptic responses would lose the millisecond-scale timing precision on which time-sensitive neural computation (such as auditory sound-localisation circuits) directly depends.
Drop active neurotransmitter removal (Step 5): without rapid clearance from the cleft, receptors would remain persistently or repeatedly activated after a single release event, the postsynaptic potential would fail to return to baseline promptly, and the synapse would be unable to transmit temporally distinct signals in rapid succession — exactly the mechanism exploited pharmacologically by reuptake-inhibiting drugs, which deliberately prolong transmitter action by interfering with this step.

Common errors

Assuming a given neurotransmitter is inherently "excitatory" or "inhibitory" as a fixed property; Step 4 shows the postsynaptic effect is determined by the receptor (and the ion it gates), not by the transmitter molecule alone — the same transmitter can produce opposite effects at different receptor subtypes.
Treating synaptic transmission as instantaneous, like current flow along an axon; the diffusion and receptor-binding steps (Step 3) introduce a real, measurable synaptic delay, a defining distinguishing feature from electrical synapses.
Assuming vesicle release is graded continuously with presynaptic depolarisation; release is fundamentally quantal (Step 2), with response strength varying through the number of vesicles released and the number of active synapses, not through a continuously variable release rate from a single vesicle.
Overlooking that most CNS synapses are chemical, not electrical, and therefore assuming gap-junction-style direct electrical coupling is the norm rather than the exception; electrical synapses exist but are comparatively rare and serve specialised roles requiring extremely fast, synchronised firing.

Discussion

Otto Loewi's 1921 experiment, demonstrating that stimulating one frog heart's vagus nerve and transferring its perfusate to a second, unstimulated heart could slow the second heart's rate, provided the first direct evidence that neurons communicate via a diffusible chemical substance (subsequently identified as acetylcholine) rather than by direct electrical contact alone — work for which Loewi later shared a Nobel Prize with Henry Dale, who characterised acetylcholine's action in more detail.

Whether a given synapse is chemical or electrical is itself under some degree of developmental and activity-dependent regulation in certain circuits, and mixed synapses, exhibiting both chemical and electrical transmission at the same contact point, are documented in parts of the nervous system requiring both very fast, tightly synchronised signalling (the electrical component) and modifiable, sign-flexible signalling (the chemical component) simultaneously.

Common misconception: that a single action potential arriving at a synapse always produces a postsynaptic action potential in the receiving neuron. In practice, a single excitatory postsynaptic potential is typically far too small on its own to reach the postsynaptic neuron's firing threshold; reliable postsynaptic firing usually requires the summed, integrated input of many synapses firing in close temporal and spatial proximity (neural-integration).

Worked examples

\[ \text{Botulinum toxin cleaves proteins required for vesicle fusion at the presynaptic terminal of motor neurons.} \]

By blocking Step 2 directly, neurotransmitter (acetylcholine, at the neuromuscular junction) cannot be released even though the presynaptic action potential and the resulting calcium influx (Step 1) still occur normally; the postsynaptic muscle receptors never receive a signal, producing the characteristic flaccid paralysis of botulism, a direct clinical illustration of Step 2's necessity. A

\[ \text{A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor blocks the presynaptic reuptake transporter for serotonin.} \]

By blocking part of Step 5 specifically (reuptake, one of the removal routes), serotonin persists longer in the synaptic cleft after each release event, prolonging and enhancing its postsynaptic effect without altering release (Step 2) or receptor binding (Step 3–4) directly. A

\[ \text{Blocking Step 2 (botulinum toxin): no transmission at all} \qquad \text{Blocking part of Step 5 (SSRI): prolonged, enhanced transmission} \]

Reading. Interfering with different steps of the same five-step relay produces qualitatively opposite pharmacological outcomes — complete blockade versus enhancement — illustrating that "synaptic transmission" is not a single lever but a multi-step pathway with several independently targetable points.

Scope. The same step-by-step logic explains the mechanism of action of a very wide range of neuroactive drugs and toxins, each classifiable by which specific step (release, receptor binding, or removal) it targets.

Further example. A presynaptic terminal releases a quantum of neurotransmitter containing \( 5.0 \times 10^3 \) molecules into a synaptic cleft with a volume of \( 2.0 \times 10^{-18} \) L. Assume ideal solution behavior and that all released molecules remain in the cleft at the peak moment before diffusion or reuptake begins. Calculate the peak molar concentration of the neurotransmitter in the cleft.

\[ n_{\text{released}} = 5.0 \times 10^3 \text{ molecules} \]

Identify the total number of molecules released from the vesicle, which is the numerator for the concentration calculation. A

\[ n_{\text{mol}} = \frac{5.0 \times 10^3}{6.022 \times 10^{23}} \text{ mol} \]

Convert the number of molecules to moles using Avogadro's constant (\( N_A \approx 6.022 \times 10^{23} \text{ mol}^{-1} \)), as concentration is defined in moles per liter. A

\[ n_{\text{mol}} \approx 8.30 \times 10^{-21} \text{ mol} \]

Perform the division to find the amount of substance in moles, retaining sufficient precision for the next step. A

\[ C = \frac{n_{\text{mol}}}{V} = \frac{8.30 \times 10^{-21} \text{ mol}}{2.0 \times 10^{-18} \text{ L}} \]

Divide the moles of neurotransmitter by the volume of the synaptic cleft to obtain the molar concentration. A

\[ C = 4.15 \times 10^{-3} \text{ mol/L} = 4.15 \text{ mM} \]

Calculate the final value and convert from mol/L to millimolar (mM) for standard biological reporting. A

\[ 4.15 \text{ mM} \]

Reading. This calculation demonstrates that even a single vesicle release event generates a very high local concentration of neurotransmitter in the attolitre-scale synaptic cleft. This high concentration ensures that a significant fraction of postsynaptic receptors are occupied, facilitating efficient signal transduction despite the small absolute number of molecules involved.

Scope. This model holds for the initial peak concentration immediately following exocytosis, assuming the cleft is well-mixed and ignoring rapid diffusion, reuptake, or enzymatic degradation that would lower the concentration over time. It applies to chemical synapses where vesicular release is the primary mode of transmission.

Problems

A toxin selectively blocks presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels without affecting sodium or potassium channels. Predict the effect on synaptic transmission, using Step 1.
Solution
The presynaptic action potential itself would still occur normally (it depends on sodium and potassium channels, action-potential), but without calcium influx (Step 1 blocked), the calcium-triggered vesicle fusion of Step 2 cannot occur; neurotransmitter release fails, and the synapse transmits no signal to the postsynaptic cell despite the presynaptic neuron firing normally.
A drug blocks acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme that normally degrades acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft. Using Step 5, predict the effect on postsynaptic response duration and explain why repeated rapid stimulation might produce an abnormal, sustained postsynaptic effect.
Solution
With degradation (one route of Step 5) blocked, acetylcholine persists in the cleft far longer after each release event, continuing to bind and rebind postsynaptic receptors; postsynaptic response duration is abnormally prolonged. With repeated rapid presynaptic firing, each new release adds to an already-elevated, slowly clearing transmitter concentration, producing a sustained, escalating postsynaptic depolarisation rather than the normal series of discrete, separable responses — the mechanism underlying the toxicity of acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting nerve agents and some pesticides.
Explain why the postsynaptic response to a given neurotransmitter can differ between two different postsynaptic neurons, even when both release identical vesicles containing the same transmitter, using Step 4.
Solution
Step 4 establishes that the sign and character of the postsynaptic response depends on the receptor (and the ion or downstream cascade it engages), not on the transmitter molecule in isolation. If the two postsynaptic neurons express different receptor subtypes for the same transmitter (e.g. one expressing a cation-permeable excitatory ionotropic receptor, the other a chloride-permeable inhibitory ionotropic receptor), the identical transmitter release event produces an excitatory postsynaptic potential in one neuron and an inhibitory one in the other.
A presynaptic neuron releases a vesicle containing 10,000 molecules of glutamate. The synaptic cleft has a volume of \( 10^{-18} \) L. If the concentration of glutamate in the cleft reaches a peak of 1 mM, calculate the fraction of released glutamate molecules that remain in the cleft at peak concentration. Assume ideal solution behavior.
Solution
First, calculate the number of moles of glutamate in the cleft at peak concentration. \[ \text{Concentration} = 1 \text{ mM} = 1 \times 10^{-3} \text{ mol/L} \] \[ \text{Volume} = 10^{-18} \text{ L} \] \[ \text{Moles in cleft} = \text{Concentration} \times \text{Volume} = (1 \times 10^{-3}) \times (10^{-18}) = 10^{-21} \text{ mol} \] Next, calculate the number of molecules in the cleft using Avogadro's number (\( N_A = 6.022 \times 10^{23} \text{ molecules/mol} \)). \[ \text{Molecules in cleft} = 10^{-21} \text{ mol} \times 6.022 \times 10^{23} \text{ molecules/mol} = 602.2 \text{ molecules} \] The total number of released molecules is 10,000. \[ \text{Fraction remaining} = \frac{602.2}{10,000} = 0.06022 \] Rounding to two significant figures, the fraction is 0.060.
Explain why the time course of the postsynaptic potential (PSP) is typically longer than the time course of the presynaptic action potential, referencing the steps of synaptic transmission.
Solution
The presynaptic action potential is a rapid electrical event lasting approximately 1-2 ms, driven by voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels. In contrast, the postsynaptic potential is a slower chemical-to-electrical transduction process. After the action potential triggers calcium influx and vesicle fusion (Step 2), neurotransmitter release into the cleft (Step 2) takes time to diffuse and bind to postsynaptic receptors (Step 3). The opening and closing of ligand-gated ion channels (Step 4) is slower than voltage-gated channels, and the removal of neurotransmitter from the cleft (Step 5) via reuptake or degradation is a finite process. These chemical and diffusion steps introduce delays and prolong the duration of the PSP, allowing for temporal summation of multiple presynaptic inputs, which is essential for neural integration.